A preposterous claim
"In his view the authorities are responsible if
innocent people are hurt.”
innocent people are hurt.”
Dr. Vetter claims to know this about a person he has never met and and has no means of knowing of!
A fabricated motiveDr. Vetter guesses, that a man whom he doesn't know, has a indiscriminate hatred to all civil servants. Reasons for that, he claims, to be the refusal of Swiss citizenship a decade before? The celebration on Ruetli Meadow stands in no
connection at all to the procedures of naturalization in Switzerland, but Dr. Vetter does not seem to care about such facts. |
Interestingly exactly the government organisation (Federal Intelligence), which had prevented the naturalization a decade before, cast suspicion against the same person with regard to the incident on Ruetli Meadow.
A clear contradiction
“He certainly wants to draw public attention. Suddenly he is noticed, all of Switzerland knows about him.”
Does that argument make sense with regards to person who did not commit the act and clear maintains his innocence? The suspect resents all the publicity which the investigation caused him and certainly never sought it, which Dr. Vetter obviously doesn't care about.
Does that argument make sense with regards to person who did not commit the act and clear maintains his innocence? The suspect resents all the publicity which the investigation caused him and certainly never sought it, which Dr. Vetter obviously doesn't care about.